„Sozialer Brennpunkt“, „Ghetto“, „No-Go-Area“ – bestimmte Stadtteile gelten als Am Beispiel ausgewählter Stadtviertel in Belgien, Deutschland, Frankreich. Gibt es No-Go-Areas in Berlin? Steht die Polizei der Gewalt in manchen Berliner Vierteln ohnmächtig gegenüber? Gibt es in Deutschland No-Go-Areas? Was sind No-Go-Areas? Hier gibt es Antworten auf die wichtigsten Fragen. Ob es No-Go-Areas in Deutschland gibt.
Deutschland: No-Go-Areas? Ortsbesuch in Duisburg-Marxloh und NeuköllnDer Begriff No-go-Area bzw. No-go-Zone entstammt der Militärterminologie und steht dort für Übergriffen schützen und plante daher, zur Fußball-Weltmeisterschaft eine Karte mit den No-go-Areas in Deutschland vorzulegen. Der Beitrag zeichnet nach, mit welchen inhaltlichen Aufladungen und Dynamiken No-go-Areas in Deutschland sowohl massenmedial als auch politisch seit ca. Interview: "Es gibt in Deutschland keine No-go-Areas". BKA -Präsident Holger Münch im Interview mit dem Handelsblatt.
No Go Areas In Deutschland Navigation menu VideoNo-Go-Areas in Berlin ( Senat bestreitet sie ) Münch: Wir müssen die Avalon Casino Funktion von Europol weiter stärken. Gab es nicht schon zuvor so einen gestrandeten SPD-Heiligen? Unsere Politiker sind ja eher Wirtschaftsangestellte, Lobbyisten als richtige Politiker. Koch: Sie wollen einen bundesweiten Datenpool zur Verbrechungsbekämpfung schaffen.
Dadurch No Go Areas In Deutschland Sie sich Zeit und kГnnen sofort Besten Wallets. - Böswilliger UnsinnSpezial Gewinner der Herzen.
В, den Гberblick zu Atu2 - No-Go-Areas in DeutschlandPetzold: DasMemo.
Some slum areas known as favelas in Brazil, most notably in Rio de Janeiro State , are controlled by gangs with automatic weapons.
It has been falsely claimed that France has Muslim-only no-go zones that are under sharia law. An early usage of the term regarding Europe was in a opinion piece by David Ignatius in The New York Times , where he wrote about France, "Arab gangs regularly vandalize synagogues here, the North African suburbs have become no-go zones at night, and the French continue to shrug their shoulders.
The head of a local association said institutional violence had contributed to the tensions resulting in the no-go zone.
Christopher Dickey , writing in Newsweek , said the situation had arisen due to racism towards immigrants.
In January , after the Charlie Hebdo shooting in Paris, various American media, including the news cable channels Fox News and CNN , described the existence of no-go zones across Europe and in France in particular.
In Sevran , a Paris commune near Charles de Gaulle airport , in which the origins of the majority of the residents are from outside France and claimed by journalist David Chazan to be a predominantly Muslim area, was alleged by women's rights campaigners to be a no-go zone for women, where women are unofficially banned from public spaces by men.
Others, including other women's rights campaigners, disputed this. A sociology paper published in said that right-wing extremists had been discussing the creation of no-go areas in Western Europe since the s.
In a February interview, German Chancellor Angela Merkel stated that there are no-go areas in Germany, saying, "There are such areas and one has to call them by their name and do something about them.
In Kenya , the ongoing conflict in Somalia , where the terrorist organization al-Shabaab controls territory, has severely affected the security situation even on the Kenyan side of the border.
There have been terrorist attacks and kidnappings in Kenya followed by a Kenyan intervention, Operation Linda Nchi , and police crackdowns.
These have affected counties bordering Somalia and in Nairobi , the suburb of Eastleigh , which is inhabited mostly by Somalis. Already in , Eastleigh was described as a no-go zone for Kenyan authorities after dark.
The Israeli Defence Forces IDF maintains a border zone on the Gaza strip and declares "no-go zones", where they may use lethal force to enforce the security exclusion zone.
It is considered unlawful by the Swedish organization Diakonia. The term "no-go zone" has been informally applied to high-crime neighborhoods in South African cities.
In South Africa , the apartheid policy created segregated neighborhoods where whites risked being removed or victimized in black-only neighborhoods and vice versa.
Because of the bantustan system, many urban inhabitants lived in the city illegally per apartheid laws.
For example, in Cape Town , Cape Flats was a neighborhood where many of those evicted were relocated. It became a "no-go area" as it was controlled by criminal gangs.
In , the situation had improved, and after convictions of several gang members, a police official said that "legislation concerning organised crime was beginning to work".
Mr Wendt said attacks amount to a "deliberate challenge to the authority of the state - attacks in which the perpetrators are expressing their contempt for our society.
Now clans claim the streets for themselves. The pockets of lawlessness have deeply upset communities with some witnesses to the violence claiming the problems are being exacerbated by the German government, which has relocated hundreds of thousands of asylum seekers and refugees into these areas.
It states: "The streets are actually regarded as a separate territory. Outsiders are physically assaulted, robbed and harassed. Experience shows that the Lebanese clans "can mobilize several hundred people in a very short period of time by means of a telephone call.
The police report leaked to Der Spiegel claimed in Duisburg, spiralling levels of violent crime perpetrated by migrants from the Middle East and the Balkans have turned parts of the city into de facto "no-go zones.
It may be an utter failure of "multiculturalism". But it happened because of a failure to institute forward thinking, i. When you import cheap labor without the necessary investment in making the next generation an assimilated success, you are going to end up with an angry disrespectful underclass that cares nothing for "your" laws.
That investment is expensive, yet cheaper in the long run than crime wave. Keeping, or allowing them to live in virtual closed societies ghettos keeps them feeling separate from mainstream society; compounded with the current worldwide "success" of the "war on drugs" We know, and have known for more than a decade, that multiculturalism simply doesn't work.
Chancellor Merkel said, five years ago, it had "utterly failed". So why are we still accepting thousands of immigrants who have nothing but contempt for our society?
Why do we support them? Often much better than our own citizens? Why do we quietly accept Sharia Law, or no law at all, in ever growing areas of major cities throughout the West?
Apparently, attempts to discuss the issue are still "racist", or "Islamaphobic", or "far right extremism". And it's not just Europe. Other Western democracies are facing the same problems, albeit at lower rates.
I would contrast this powerful and disturbing report with some US history. After the large migration of African-Americans during the Great Depression out of the racist American South to the urban American North, which turned out to be almost as racist and White Supremacist as the South, a troubled African-American culture of poverty, drug use, and often black-on-black crime developed.
In contrast, the terrible problems of 'immigrant' crime in German cities, and French cities and elsewhere, are primarily caused not by poverty and racism, but by militantly intolerant Islam.
In the German cities described by Soeren Kern, Islamic immigrants are met by a recklessly generous welfare system that operates not to ease their assimilation but to fund their supremacist separatism.
In America today, there are some signs of a new enlightenment as the country considers White responsibility for the down-trodden state of African-Americans in some blighted inner city ghettos.
In dramatic contrast, native Europeans need to face a culture of crime -- "a parallel culture of criminality" -- that is caused not by a supremacist culture in themselves, but in the Islamic immigrants who were let in by leaders unaware of the inevitable threat to Europe's future those immigrants would represent.
It's an open question whether they will develop the insight and political will to defend themselves from this threat before they are overwhelmed. Indeed, because of the demographic rise of Islamic populations in Europe, it is ironically more likely that the ISIS threat will be defeated or at least contained than that the internal threat to European civilization will be overcome.
Besides the unfettered rise of Islamic populations, this is also due to the widespread recognition of the ISIS threat, while political blindness remains firmly in place regarding the threat in Europe.
The Grand Mufti was welcomed by the Germans and he advocated the final solution. Germany replaced its Jews with Muslims. A great deal they got.
Within years there will begin a civil war in Germany and other EU states. Or the EU will collapse under it own idiotic PC culture. The balance will be restored, but over the bodies of many German natives.
Unlike the Jews, who contributed to the German society, and got whacked for that, the Muslims are only dragging that society down, and are being hailed and paid with welfare funds.
Germany and other countries in the EU must immediately stop allowing Muslim immigrants from seeking asylum into their countries or their countries will not be theirs anymore.
It will become so bad that people from other countries will not be safe visiting there for business or pleasure. This may seem cruel; but if the West, including America, desires to remain free, Muslim immigrants who do not abide by the rules, policies, and laws of the nations they are living in should be deported at once.
The Jews were not the trouble makers of the world. Just think how peaceful Europe and most of the world would be by now. Well it may be Poetic Justice after all.
I wonder just what the Jews did to have upset the Germans so much to have carried out the final solution? I await patiently to see Germany drown in it's mess.
Or are they going to have another final solution? Dr David Salinger. Here they are clearly admitting that they -- and their masters -- refuse to enforce the laws of Germany.
Yet they are calling for a ban on demonstrations against these terrorists cells that they enable.
What a shame. Germany and all of Europe murdered and expelled its Jews and welcomed the Muslim Arabs.
Germany should send those criminals back to their countries. Many apply for asylum because they are running from the law in their home countries. The Germans better wake up and vote for the politicians who will stand for Germany.
I was working in Germany in and life was safe for all people. There were guest workers and they came to Germany to work. Now they come to Germany to kill, rape and live on German taxpayer's money.
This is what happens when a country replaces a peaceful and productive Jewish community with Barbarians! Until the Leaders of the various Police Districts and Civic Leaders publicly admit that there is a major problem, and state that they will have to take drastic measures to regain permanent control of these No Go Zones, the problem will only continue to grow.
The Civic Authorities, the Government and Police Forces have a joint responsibility to ensure that communities are kept safe and law abiding, and they are manifestly failing in that duty, and if they continue to fail in maintaining civil order the consequences will be anarchy, with irretrievable harm to German Society.
The only solution is a harsh crack down on this lawlessness, with the ring leaders severely punished and removed from society, coupled by forced deportations of the perpetrators and any non German born citizen or resident who refuses to abide by civilised German standards behaviour and observance of the law.
No one should be entitled to a free ride on the taxpayer, who chooses to thumb their nose at the law and civilised civic norms of the society who took them in.
The ones worthy of a second chance will fall into line, those who don't should be expelled. Can one not see a little bit of Karma in this situation with the no go areas for the police.
Are these not the same gentlemen that have colluded in hiding the rapes and general lawlessness of these savages from their own people. The same police would prosecute German people for hate speech and so called islamaphobia.
The protectors now need protection from the protected. Police forces are organised to handle normal crime, not to deal with the take-over of areas by masses of people with no fear of retribution.
In war, there are various means of vanquishing the enemy. The cheapest is by cutting off the resources of the enemy. In this case, the major resource is the social benefits - "entitlements" - granted by and paid for by working citizens and by government deficits which in turn reduce the value of of the savings and assets of the citizens.
These social benefits should be cut off, and on the other hand the invading population should be encouraged to leave, primarily by granting temporary support for the inimical population who have already left the country irrevocably.
This policy will have to be enforced by military strength: by encircling the conquered areas with sufficient force to prevent the enemy from attacking citizens.
It may entail temporary relocation of citizens to safe areas. I would agree with this answer. But first the German people must wake up and support each other and get rid of Angela Merkel's government and all the "politically correct" police chiefs.
They need draconian measures - but doesn't this strike a chill? Remember the mess they got themselves into with Hitler? They do not seem to be very good at judging their leaders sensibly.
Just say thanks to Merkel and the New World Order. How's that compassion and acceptance of other cultures without prejudice working out for you?
Merkel is becoming the ruler of chaos. Soeren Kern produces yet another problem facing Germany and the West in general.
A plague of Locusts has descended on all Western society. All the liberal lefty fools will be telling themselves that this is just people reacting to their surroundings, having fled war zones that have had a devastating effect on their lives.
Apparently they are so shocked and distressed that they have turned to crime. Organised gangs ruling their territories, just some of the signs that these poor people show when in so much distress, the first thing they do in a civilised country is choose to turn to crime.
Easy targets. The West's political class have shown weakness and by doing so they have given these people a free pass in Western society to carry on as they want.
They think they are above the law and so use large numbers when confronting the police. This is done everywhere there are Muslim communities.
Within minutes a large crowd of intimidating Muslims can be gathered to prevent police and other areas of authority carrying out their duty.
It is simply by showing kindness, and offering to help, that the Muslims automatically see these things as weakness to be even further exploited.
To that end they will push the laws of the land they are in as far as they can. The more they get away with, the more they push. This does not look good for the people, not only in Germany, but other Western countries.
The politicians are in denial and are completely deluding themselves if they think these people will become good and beneficial citizens, they are here for what they can get.
They aren't here to assimilate or fully integrate, they'll even say what the authorities want to hear, but it all means nothing!
They are solely in the West to undermine our society, to get what they can and to conquer all in the name of Islam. Nothing more, nothing less!
It's about time the sleeping giant that is Europe woke up and recognised the danger brought by these people. This is what Left Wing politicians and various migrant friendly charities want to import to the UK.
I sincerely hope that the PM overturns the ruling by three so called "Senior judges" to obstruct the will of the majority of the British population.
There are far more important issues at stake here than economic considerations. Do race and ethnic divisions qualify as no go zones in America's cities?
Is it possible that Westerners are already conditioned to be accepting of "No-Go Zones" that are in your face posted no go zones even though ethnicity and race defines turfs and territories in USA cities.
Are no go zones perceived as being more honest by groups that are represented by groups like BLM or drug gang rivalries? I am asking questions to make sense of why freer societies would formalize prejudice and bigotry.
Ministers from the central European nation wrote in their report that authorities had "no control" over residents in these neighbourhoods, adding that the growth of radical Islam is "increasing the terrorist risk and imperilling our culture".
A migrant taunts Hungarian riot police as they fire tear gas and water cannon on the Serbian side of the border, near Roszke. According to the Hungarian government there are areas across the EU where "the norms of the host society barely prevail" due to huge levels of migration.
The website says: "The mandatory European quotas increase the terrorist risk in Europe and imperils our culture.